2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, without the record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and appears to have participated in the instant crime without pecuniary suspicion.

However, the crime of this case is highly poor in light of the Criminal Law and the attitude of the defendant's act of withdrawing the amount of damage caused by fraud deposited in the account through the access medium connected to the third party's account under the direction of the victim of telephone financing fraud (one-name "Sishing"), and then remitting it to the above mediation staff (one-name "measures to withdraw"). The crime of this case is discovered with the awareness that it is intended to use it for the crime or intended to be used for the crime, and with the awareness of the fact that it is in custody of access media connected to a large number of other other persons. The crime of " Bosishing" committed by the defendant as above is a major crime of the economically weak and led to a situation where it is more difficult for the victim to use it as a major crime, and it is very difficult for the financial institution as well as the members of the society to seriously damage trust of the other trading parties, and it is also very bad that it is highly likely that the crime of this case to eradicate the total amount of punishment by means of the entire organization or organization of the crime.