부당노동행위구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. The circumstances leading to the decision on reexamination of this case
A. The intervenors employ 370 full-time workers and operate the “R Hospital” located in Jeju City (hereinafter “instant hospital”).
From January 19, 2004, the Plaintiff works as an emergency medical technician at the emergency department of the instant hospital, and is a member of the Korea Public Transport and Social Services Workers’ Union (hereinafter “Public Transport and Social Workers’ Union”) affiliated with the Korea R Hospital Branch of Jeju Branch of the Medical Association (hereinafter “instant Branch”).
Members of the instant sub-chapter include the Plaintiff (three emergency medical technicians working in the emergency room and two radiation workers).
B. At the instant hospital, more than 190 nurses work for the instant hospital.
In 2012 and 2013, the emergency department of the instant hospital worked for 16 nurses, 4 emergency medical technicians including the Plaintiff, and 1 emergency medical technicians.
C. From July 1, 2012, the intervenors paid KRW 50,00 per month to the nurses working in the artificial further training room, the intensive care room, the emergency room, and the operation room (eight persons for artificial retardation, 17 patients' rooms, 16 emergency rooms, and 16 surgery rooms).
On September 20, 2012, the Intervenor and the public transportation labor union concluded a wage agreement with the Intervenor, and the said wage agreement contains the following contents:
(hereinafter referred to as “the Wage Convention, 2012”). 1. The average of the entire employees shall be increased by 2.5%.
2. The instant hospital should not be discriminated against on the ground that it is a member in the future wage class.
3. The time of application of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply retroactively from July 1, 2012.
E. The intervenors are as follows from July 1, 2013 to C.
He/she shall include the workplace specified in paragraph (1) and shall not exceed 10 ambling rooms (referring to a place where a degree course is presented) and ambling rooms.
'The workplace of this case' is referred to as 'the workplace of this case', 'the workplace of this case', i.e.
) The 50,000 won was paid monthly as a supply adjustment allowance to the two nurses working in the room (two glaters and five glaters in the internal room).
F. The Plaintiff on November 15, 2013.