Since “H” as stated in the facts charged of this case refers not to “the victim F,” it refers to “the large forest industry,” the Defendant did not insult the victim, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case and erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

On April 17, 2010, an article containing the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the court of first instance as follows: ① on DNA 2, D. 1, 2010, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200,000, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00.