However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took a dispute with the victim F (34 years) who is a company partner at the G, 2, and 103 door 103 door 1, 2017, while drinking alcohol with the victim F (34 years) who is the company partner; (b) went into dispute, and (c) went into the face of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant committed an internal scopic injury, which requires treatment for about seven days from time to time by beer disease, which is a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a written statement concerning F in the police interrogation protocol, and reporting on each investigation (the investigation of the other party to the witness in the field, the F photograph of the suspect, the testimony by the witness, and the submission of a written diagnosis of injury);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to scene photographs of an injury, and vice versa;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the defendant among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant for the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (recognating the reason for a reduction of amount): A person who uses dangerous articles against the defendant. Circumstances favorable to the defendant: contingent crimes; a victim’s punishment is not granted; a victim’s mistake is not granted; a victim’s punishment is not granted; a victim has no record of criminal punishment; a family member who supports his/her child, etc. at the age of her child, etc.;