2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 14, 2015, the Plaintiff operating the cing and printing industry accepted the Defendant’s proposal that the Plaintiff would simplify the business partners into the Plaintiff and continuous transactions with the Plaintiff, and began transactions with the Defendant.

B. However, the Defendant did not comply with the contract for unification of the business partners, and the order was also interrupted after October 2017.

On October 2017, the Defendant accepted the request from the Defendant in charge of the Defendant for the reduction of the payment period and the improvement of quality, and introduced a new multi-level hosting machine and digital level, but the Defendant suspended the transaction without any reasons after December 2017.

C. The Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the total amount of KRW 86,770,100 (the total amount of KRW 4,401,100 and the total amount of KRW 6,600,000 for losses, such as original inventory) incurred by the Plaintiff by unilaterally destroying a continuous transaction promise (the amount of KRW 43,769,000 for operating losses of KRW 22,200,00 for the digital printing machine).

2. Determination and conclusion that the Defendant committed a single transaction or continuous transaction with the Plaintiff solely on the basis of each of the evidence Nos. 1 and 11

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as there is no need to live further, because it is not sufficient to recognize the causal relationship between the defendant's trade division and the damage of the plaintiff's claim.