beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.20 2016나6312

공사대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court is approved, and the following notes shall be added:

“A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that there was no such transaction with the Plaintiff. However, according to the record (No. 3) recording of telephone conversations between the Plaintiff and D, it can be confirmed that D made a statement to the effect that D had not been paid to the Plaintiff. However, according to the fact that D is the present representative of the Defendant, and the fact that D is the current representative of the Defendant, ② according to the details of the deposit and withdrawal transactions submitted by the Plaintiff on December 26, 2016 after the closing of argument, the Defendant can confirm the details of the transfer of money to the Plaintiff, the above argument by the Defendant contrary to the above facts of recognition is without merit.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.