beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.18 2019가합666

공사대금 등

Text

1. The defendant has to the plaintiffs each stated in the "request amount" column in the "request amount sheet for each plaintiff's claim amount in attached Form, as well as to this.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs were awarded a subcontract by the Defendant for construction works, such as the foundation, Costaco, cleaning, painting, distribution, electricity and telecommunications among construction works for the new construction works for the electric power plant located in the city of permanent residence of S which the Defendant performed, and the new construction works for the electric power plant located in TY-si located in U's Ansan-si, as well as the new construction works for the electric power plant located in U's Ansan-si located in U.S. (hereinafter "each subcontracted works in this case") with the amount indicated in the “amount claimed” in the “amount claimed” list for each Plaintiff’s claim amount.

B. The Plaintiffs completed each of the instant subcontracted projects by December 9, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap's evidence 1, Gap's evidence 2-1 through 16, Gap's evidence 3, the purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition as above, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs the statutory interest rate under Article 3(1) main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Addenda of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019), Article 3(1) main sentence of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 3(1) main sentence of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, Jun. 1, 2019).

3. In conclusion, each of the plaintiffs' claims is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and each of the remaining claims is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.