On June 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, Seo-si, Seo-gu, Seo-si, C, No. 25, and the victim-friendly E, using the gap in which the victim D (19 years of age, leisure) and the victim-friendly E are fastened; (b) 10,000 won of the market price on the tables No. 25 (hereinafter “the instant bank”); (c) 40,000 won of the market price on the wall; and (d) 1,000 won of the market price on the wall.

US$ 1 1, 1,40 won, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, and 9 cards were cut by hand.

2. In full view of all the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the instant court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, which led to the proof that there was no reasonable doubt as to the Defendant’s intent to obtain unjust enrichment at the time of the instant case.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. According to CCTV video, etc., ① the Defendant divided the victim’s friendship E and approximately nine minutes of the victim’s friendship, which were adjoining his/her table, on June 22, 2018, among four-person tables, one of the instant bags C (hereinafter “instant main office”) at the time of the instant case (hereinafter “instant main office”). ② the Defendant was seated by telephone around 02:07 on the same day; ② the Defendant was able to take the instant bank on his/her own, and was able to take on his/her own, and then he/she was able to take on his/her own, and he/she was able to take on his/her own, and then he/she was able to take on his/her own, and then he/she was able to take on his/her own, and then he/she was able to take on his/her own, and then he/she was able to take on his/her own, and the Defendant was able to take on his/her side.