A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. It does not seem that there are new circumstances or special changes in circumstances that can be reflected in the sentencing after the pronouncement of the judgment of the court below, and further, even if the court below comprehensively takes into account the circumstances and various conditions of sentencing as revealed in the grounds of sentencing and the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is deemed to be adequate and is too heavy or unhued so that it goes beyond

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.