However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 19:35 on May 11, 2014, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of notification as to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (morsing disturbance) by, for instance, passing a riot while drinking in front of the police box in the Seocho-si B, Seopo Police Station, which was located in Seopo-si B, and obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties concerning the management of the situation of the police box at one time when considering the face of the above police officer at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] considering the fact that the defendant has any record of being sentenced to suspension of execution due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant, the defendant takes into account the fact that he reflects the fact that he has been sentenced to suspension of execution, and supports the children yet, etc., the sentence like the order shall