beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.04.09 2013고합94

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On November 18, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Drivers, Violence, etc.) was on the street in front of the full-time Dong office located in Changwon-si, Mapo-si, Changwon-si, and two female drivers were on board before the full-time Dong office located in Changwon-si, Mapo-si, and became to be the “Ena”, a destination, when the victim C (year 51) was driven.

The Defendant, around the time when the above taxi passes ahead of the Masan-dong Southern-dong Center, expressed his opinions on whether it will leave the house between the Defendant and women working together with the Defendant and the Defendant, and there were mutual opinions. The Defendant saw that the victim would live in the direction that the above female frighting is desired to do so, and when the victim booms the fright of the victim, and boomed the face face of the victim twice in drinking.

As a result, the defendant got the victim, who is the driver of a vehicle in operation, to receive approximately 14 days of medical treatment from the victim.

2. On November 19, 2013, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) performed official duties of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) within the G police box located in the Sincheon-si, Sincheon-gu, Sinsan-si; and (c) during the process that the said taxi engineer, carried the Defendant into the Defendant’s police box for the said reason, the Defendant took a serious bath to C; and (d) the assistant H affiliated with the said police box continued to take a bath for the Defendant, and she sleeped the flab with both

The Defendant continued to escape the disturbance of the Defendant, and the security guards belonging to the above police box were spawned with I’s spath to spath by hand. The Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of criminal reporting duties, such as spathing the spath of the J’s spathm.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to C, H, J, I, and K;

1. Each investigation report (as to attachment of an injury diagnosis document, attachment of suspect behavior photographs taken in ctv, attachment of recorded ctv image pictures of the suspect, video data such as recorded ctv image pictures of the suspect, face-to-face image pictures, etc.).