2. The defendant has the following favorable circumstances:

The Defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case and reflected against himself.

The defendant agreed with the victim about the crime of injury, and the victim has not been punished.

However, there are the following disadvantageous circumstances for the defendant.

The defendant has been punished for more than ten times due to violent crimes, including probation.

Although the defendant is under probation due to violent crimes, he committed a second violence crime.

Defendant did not agree with the victim regarding the crime of assault.

At the time of drinking driving, the blood alcohol concentration is considerably high by 0.181%.

In light of the fact that there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment because new sentencing data have not been submitted in the trial, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.