except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 1, 2014, at around 20:30, the Defendant discovered that the two mains, which are dangerous objects in the house, are flick-gun B, Ulsan-gun, B, Dong 108, and that the wife C and the victim D (38 years of age) were flicking, and considered that the two mains were flicking, which are dangerous objects in the house, flick-gun, and flick-gun, followed the victim's flick-gun, and flick-gun, the victim flick-gun, who flick-gun, would flick-do flick-gun, and flick-do 108, and flick-do flick-gun, flick-gun, which were dangerous objects in the kitchen, and flick-do fld the victim's body, and flick-do fl the victim's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of the length of a relative blade of a suspect) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Criminal Crimes, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation by carrying a deadly weapon);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shall be determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the mitigated area (4 to 1 year), the mitigated area (4 to 1 year) [special mitigation] [decision of a sentence] (a person who has a deadly weapon], and intimidation the victim with a deadly weapon; (b) the victim is not wanting to be punished; (c) the victim does not want to be punished; and (d) the sentencing factors indicated in the record, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct