기타
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Based on the facts, the plaintiff seems to independently form the council of occupants' representatives, 7 complexes of the same name as the apartment of this case, which are D apartment 1 to 6 complexes (in total, 12 Dong-dong 43 households, hereinafter "the apartment of this case") in Ypo-si.
Among the residents living in one complex 102, the management rules of the apartment complex of this case are expressed as the representative of the third building unit of the apartment complex of this case as the representative of the Dong, but in fact, they refer to the representative of each apartment complex.
The third president (term of office: from April 29, 2013 to April 28, 2015) of the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case is the person who was the third president (term of office: from April 29, 2013 to April 28, 2015). Defendant B is a resident of the second apartment of this case, and Defendant C is a resident of the 601 unit of the
On May 26, 2015, the election commission of the instant apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “election commission”) stipulated the requirement that the period of registration of a candidate from June 15, 2015 to June 16, 2015, the voting period is from June 24, 2015 to June 25, 2015, and the voting period is from June 24, 2015 to June 25, 2015, each apartment complex of this case is planned to be elected by only one unit of six units, including the individual constituency, for each unit of six units, to be elected. As to the qualification for registration of a candidate, the requirement that “a person who does not violate the provisions of Article 18 of the Management Rules.”
After the public announcement, the election commission held a meeting on June 15, 2015 and decided not to impose other grounds for restriction, such as Article 18 of the Management Rules, in addition to the nine items of Article 10(1) of the Management Rules concerning the qualification of the representative candidate for each building.
On June 18, 2015, the election commission established a candidate for the representative of each building of the apartment complex of this case except for the four complexes without any candidate, such as the plaintiff and Eul as the representative candidate for each building of the complex of this case and the defendants as the representative candidate for each building of six complexes, and the representative candidate for each building of the apartment complex of this case as well as one complex with two candidates.