부작위거부처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and all of the plaintiff's claims are changed or added in exchange for the trial.
1. Part on Defendant Republic of Korea
A. Since a lawsuit seeking performance of obligations under the current Administrative Litigation Act on the part of a claim for criminal compensation of KRW 10 billion is not recognized, this part of the claim is unlawful.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion.
B. In an administrative litigation on the remaining parts of a claim, the purport and cause of the claim shall be specified in the subject matter of the lawsuit and the scope of the trial of the court, and the matters to be stated in the complaint necessary to determine whether the period for filing the lawsuit is complied with, and whether the claim is appropriate, shall be specified in detail so as to clearly identify the contents and scope thereof. The written statement submitted by the Plaintiff cannot specify the purport and cause of the claim, and there is no other
Therefore, this part of the claim added in the trial is an improper lawsuit and it is not possible to correct the defects.
2. The part concerning the chief prosecutor of the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office and the Seoul Southern Prosecutors' Office
A. If Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 added the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff filed a request for the disclosure of information with the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office in 2018, and the chief prosecutor of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office filed a request for a refund of a fine of two million won, etc. on June 4, 2018, and the chief prosecutor of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office issued a provisional disposition for a refund of fines in this case on June 7, 2018, and the plaintiff filed a request for the revocation of the provisional disposition for a refund of fines in this case on June 7, 2018. The Seoul High Prosecutors' Office Administrative Appeals Commissions of the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office (Administrative Appeals Commissions of the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office) on December 12, 2018. The written ruling of this case reached the plaintiff on December 24, 2018, and the remaining claims were dismissed, and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit of this case on May 24, 2018.