However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who acquires a Class 1 ordinary license and is engaged in driving a rocketing taxi belonging to B.

On October 15, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 18:35, and driven the front road of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D in the direction of the direction of the Bododo 4 lanes in the direction of the direction of the Bodo Do Do 4, and continued to proceed to the opposite lane at the point of the accident, approximately 10km in the speed.

There is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and in such a case, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles is prohibited from making a U-turn at a place other than the permitted point for U-turns, and there was a duty of care that is prohibited from driving the center line with the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and failed to proceed as soon as possible due to the body of vehicles, and caused the collision between the victim E ( South, 28 years old) driving along two lanes, following the center line of yellow solid lines, and the part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, following the right side of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

In conclusion, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim E, such as the upper right hand, the upper part of the upper part of the road, the upper part of the river, and the injury to the victim G who was on board the lower part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, including approximately 2 weeks of cryp, tension, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the police in relation to the defendant's legal statement E;

1. A written statement of G and E;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) (2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act lies in the occurrence of traffic accidents by the defendant who has committed a central line.