However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 19, 2013, the Defendant made a telephone call to the victim B at an unsound place. The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant paid a balance with the company’s money of KRW 100 million to purchase a son’s apartment house with son. It borrowed KRW 10 million to the company.”

However, the defendant had a husband separately, and it is thought that the above 10 million won should be considered as a investment deposit to the person who is C, and even if the victim borrowed 10 million won from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the national bank account (E) in the name of D and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;