2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. In full view of the following facts, the following facts can be acknowledged in light of Gap evidence Nos. 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including additional numbers) and the entire purport of the pleading.

(1) On June 18, 2014, around 12:54, 2014, on the roads of Samsung T&M 10 Samsung T&M, Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the collisioned between COba and D Driving E (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Deceased proceeded along the two-lanes of Samsung Station’s five-lane road on the side of the sports complex, and even if the vehicle signal was changed to a stop signal, the vehicle signal was done as it was. The Defendant’s left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was proceeding on the right side of the direction of the Deceased’s progress, to the left side of the vehicle in line with the vehicle’s progress signals, was shocked.

(3) The instant accident occurred more than five to six seconds after the Defendant’s ongoing signal was changed to green.

According to the black image of a vehicle that runs in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s vehicle, it appears that the deceased’s Otoba does not appear at the intersection for the five to six seconds above, and the speed immediately preceding the accident appears. The time taken up to shock with the Defendant’s vehicle appeared at the intersection is only one second degree.

(4) According to the above black image, it can be known that Defendant vehicle was waiting more than part of the cross-road stop line prior to a green change. However, compared with the next vehicle waiting in a stop line, the part beyond the stop line is not the distance of one vehicle but part of the crosswalk next to the stop line.

In addition, while the defendant's vehicle enters the intersection and proceeds from the accident of this case, the interval between the defendant's vehicle and the side vehicle is far beyond the distance prior to the departure as above.