2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and sought the wife.

However, as a result of the Defendant’s crime of this case, the victim suffered serious injuries that occur in the upper part of the body, which has been much familiar with that of the body, but it seems not easy to treat. Moreover, the mental impulse and pain of the victim seems to remain considerably for a long time.

In addition, the father of the victim complained of the seriousness of the damage to the court below, and the defendant did not pay a severe punishment on the defendant, stating that "the defendant should not be able to compensate for the damage due to the enemy-satisfeing."

In addition, even at the time of the trial, the victim's agreement with the victim or the defendant's direct damage recovery is not made.

On the other hand, there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that could reflect the defendant's sentencing in favor of the defendant.

Based on this case’s sentencing case’s case’s sentencing case’s case’s sentencing case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s sentencing is not too heavy beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, given that the lower court’s sentencing is based on the consideration of various circumstances, including the motive and means of related criminal conduct against the Defendant’s age, including the Defendant’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.