Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the part of the instant charges of indecent act by compulsion on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

Examining the record in accordance with the relevant legal doctrine, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of indecent act by compulsion, and the probative value of evidence

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.