However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) decided to install and provide Kameras and other equipment that can commit fraud upon the request of E, which was introduced from D, known to the general public; and (b) E and F, by using Kameras and Kameras installed in the Kameras and the Kameras with a mark to marize a plaque with a special material; and (c) D and G, through monitors, intended to commit fraud by reporting the saton through monitors and informing E and F thereof.

피고인은 D과 함께 2013. 1. 26.경 보령시 H에 있는 E의 사무실에서, 그곳 형광등에 소형카메라를 설치하고, E에게 특수물질로 표시한 화투패를 교부하였고, D과 G은 2013. 1. 28. 21:00경부터 그 다음날 02:30경까지 위 사무실 옆 주차장 내 I 에쿠스 차량에서, 모니터를 통해 화투패를 보고 이를 귀에 소형 이어폰을 넣은 E과 F에게 알려주었고, E과 F은 위 일시경 위 사무실에서, 사실은 D과 G이 위와 같이 화투패를 알려주는 것이어서 정상적으로 도박을 하는것이 아니었음에도 불구하고, 피해자 J, K, L을 상대로 위 화투패를 이용하여 속칭 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 을 속임수 없이 하는 척하여, 이에 속은 피해자들로부터 합계 362만 원을 편취하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, F, D, and G, acquired economic benefits by deceiving victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the suspect of G by the prosecution;

1. Statements in part of the suspect examination protocol prepared by the prosecution two times for E, F, and D respectively;

1. Entry of some of the third protocol of examination of suspect to the prosecution in E;

1. The third written statement about F in part of the interrogation protocol of the prosecution (including D substitute parts) against F;

1. Statement by the prosecution against L, J and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on attachment to written judgments on accomplicess);

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;