2. The fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and that the stolen mobile phone returned to the victim is favorable to the defendant.

However, even though the defendant had been punished three times for the same crime, the fact that the defendant again committed the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances that led to the instant crime, including the circumstances and motive, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s allegation of unfair sentencing is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.