beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.07.05 2013노925

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The punishment (one year of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable;

[The appellate court shall appoint a public defender and appoint a private defense counsel and then revoke the appointment of a public defense counsel, and the appellate court shall calculate the period for submitting the appellate brief from the date on which the public defense counsel or the defendant was notified of the receipt of the notification of the trial records (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 2006Mo623, Dec. 7, 2006). The defendant's defense counsel shall submit a counsel's opinion at the first trial date with the deadline for submitting the appellate brief, and the defendant's defense counsel shall not be able to drive normally due to the influence of drugs. However, the appellate brief submission period after the deadline for submitting the appellate brief shall be determined within the supplement of the reasons for appeal submitted within the deadline for submitting the appellate brief and the statement of objections submitted by the defendant, and the appellate court does not include errors of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and even if examining the records of this case including the defense counsel's opinion, it shall be deemed that there is no matter to investigate ex officio regarding the judgment of the court.

참조조문