2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff is liable to compensate for damages due to the failure to perform the duty to expand the joint wholesale market facilities. The defendant failed to maintain and improve the joint wholesale market facilities in the market in this case, and to manage them reasonably, which led to the lack of auction facilities such as agricultural and fishery products storage facilities. Accordingly, the defendant is running an auction of agricultural products on the street such as a ground parking lot, and intermediary wholesalers including the plaintiff are bound to keep the sold agricultural products on the street. Thus, the plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 40,00,000 due to the severe damage caused by cold weather damage on the date of the bid, and the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the above damages.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 20 of the Act on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products, a person who is obligated to maintain, improve, and manage a wholesale market facility is a person who sets up a wholesale market. According to Article 17 of the same Act, a wholesale market like the market of this case is established at the Special Metropolitan City, Metropolitan City, Special Self-Governing City, Special Self-Governing City, Special Self-Governing Province, or Si. Thus, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, not the opener of the market of this case, has a legal obligation to expand the joint market facilities of the market of this case. Furthermore, there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant has a duty to expand the joint market facilities of the market of this case under the contract of this case pursuant to the middle sale transaction agreement entered into with the Plaintiff. Thus, this part