도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Around 13:09 on June 1, 2001, the summary of the facts charged, C, an employee of the Defendant, loaded freight at around 44.7 tons in total weight at the business office of the Cheongdok in Korea, a Cheongdok-ro, a Cheongdo-ro, a Cheongdo-ro, a Cheongdo-ro, a Cheongdo-ro, a Cheongdo-ro, a Cheongdo-do-ro, a main office
2. On the facts charged in this case, the public prosecutor charged a public prosecution by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the facts charged in this case.
When an agent, employee or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, Article 86 of the above Act shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.
“The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga decided October 28, 2010, ruled 2010, retroactively invalidated by a simple decision of unconstitutionality.
Since the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.