beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2019.07.18 2018고정132

공중위생관리법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 16, 2017 to June 19, 2018, the Defendant provided accommodation business with a total floor area of KRW 552 square meters and KRW 17,000,000 per guest room for an unspecified number of customers without receiving a report from the competent authorities in operating accommodation “C,” with a total floor area of KRW 80,000 to KRW 30,000 per guest room without receiving a fee from an unspecified number of customers without receiving a report from the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The current status of an accusation, a business trip report, or a lodging business operator without a report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the lodging establishment’s Internet homepage, lodging establishment’s field photograph, and building register;

1. Article 20 (1) 1 of the Public Health Control Act and Articles 3 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of applicable criminal facts and punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding a provisional payment order is that the Defendant would be legally legalized within the nearest time, and the Defendant acquired a multi-family house and run a lodging business without filing a report.

Since 2013, the Defendant was punished by a fine for a violation of the Public Health Control Act on two occasions in 2016 and 2017.

The sewage pipe construction is in progress to connect the money to the sewage terminal treatment facilities at present by the operators of neighboring accommodation establishments such as the defendant.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the conditions of all the sentencing shown in the arguments in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined in the same manner as the order.