However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal suplicing suping the mobile phone of the customers who neglected management at the soup bank, and Defendant B, at around 03:51 on March 18, 2018, suping the soup bank in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and at the public street of the soup bank, Defendant A suping the network around the surrounding areas, and Defendant A took a theft with one mobile phone of approximately KRW 800,000 of the market price owned by the victim E, at the same place at around 03:58 on the same day, Defendant B took a theft with one cell phone of approximately KRW 1,00,000 of the market price owned by the victim F, and Defendant A suping the start-up of the soup vehicle and suping it outside the soup bank.

As a result, the Defendants committed a theft of two cellular phone numbers of victims.

2. The Defendant, as described in the above paragraph (1), stolen two cell phone machines together with B, and was accompanied by the date B and his relative H, and became subject to contact with the police who discovered the Defendant’s personal information by tracking the vehicle number used for the above crime.

B has family members to support, who are able to receive severe punishment due to the same kind of force, and H referred to as "I amblinger who will have stolen the same as A," and the Defendant consented thereto.

Around 10:20 on April 3, 2018, the Defendant was investigated at the G Geungpo Police Station I’s I’s statement recording room, and said, as so agreed with H, the Defendant made a false statement to the Geungpo Police Station that “The Defendant stolen two cell phoness with H” as stated above.

As a result, the defendant got the criminal defendant to escape B who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Investigation report (verification by KPC access by H on the day of the case), investigation report (Comparison with suspect H and B characteristics, etc. verified by video), investigation report (suspect B on the suspect B site), and fact-finding photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to capture CCTV in C;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;