폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. At around 01:45 on June 14, 2015, the summary of the facts charged, Defendant and D, E, F, G, and H were dissatisfied with each other on the grounds that the victim I, who had frighted in the way, expressed the 18-gu Non-Fp plaza in Busan, would have been able to play a breathal bath with the above G, while G was dissatisfied with the victim I, against the victim I would have frighten the breath and play a breathal face.
In addition, the defendant and D, E, F, H are together with G and expressed a desire to the victim I, and the victim J, who is a driver of I, who is a driver of the victim's face, walked the victim's face, walked the victim's face, walked up the victim's face, and was sealed by the victim J, who was a driver of I, who was on the side, was boomed by drinking, fright face, body, etc.
As a result, the Defendant and D, E, F, G, and H jointly committed an injury to the victim I, such as the safinite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finites
2. Determination
1. When a dispute arises between G and I between the Defendant and the defense counsel, the Defendant left the scene, and the victims did not have been injured by assaulting the victims jointly with the daily behaviors as stated in the facts charged.
2. The prosecutor of the judgment, as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, submits each police interrogation protocol to D, E, G, F, and H (hereinafter collectively referred to as “D, etc.”). Since the defendant consented to the defendant as co-defendants as evidence to use each police interrogation protocol against the above D, etc. as evidence and denies the contents, each police interrogation protocol against D, E, and H against the above D, etc. is inadmissible as evidence (each police interrogation protocol against the above D, E, and H did not recognize the authenticity at the court, and each police interrogation protocol against G and F denies denies the contents of the defendant, which is admissible as evidence).