The punishment of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is favorable that the defendant recognized his mistake, and that the defendant treated the injury dog on the day following the crime of this case to the veterinary hospital.

However, there is a history of punishment six times as to the defendant's violation of the same Road Traffic Act, including two times of probation, and in particular, it is disadvantageous that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on April 17, 2014 due to a non-licensed driving on April 17, 201 and again carried out a non-licensed driving on the five-month basis. In full view of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and the defendant

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.