However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On September 22, 2013, the Defendant, at C’s house located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, put C in a single-use injection machine containing approximately 0.05g of psychotropic drugs, crophones (i.e., a single-use injection machine containing approximately 0.05g of psychotropic drugs, and crophones administered crophones by having the Defendant injection into his arms.

On December 18, 2013, at around 14:00, the Defendant received approximately 0.05 gramphones from C without compensation on the roads near Yannam-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, and received from C three times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and administered phiphones over four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the protocol of examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Status of individual entry or departure;

1. A response to a request for appraisal and a written appraisal (2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of receipt and delivery of, and medication in, philopon) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. for the Fact-finding, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) that has a history of being sentenced to the suspended sentence as a result of a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act in 199);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;