On May 22, 2017, the Defendant, at around 09:03, delivered to the victim E (the age of 34, n) the Maart entrance in the Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, for the delivery to the victim E (the age of 34, n).

130,000 won or more of clothes in Furma trademark have been stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on damage;

1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Suspect’s Purpose of Crime) - Photographs related to the instant case (criminal suspect’s form of crime), backbook (Attachment of CCTV for Investigation Report) (the Defendant and his defense counsel merely known that the Defendant was aware of the instant stuff, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intention to larceny.

However, according to the photographs and CCTV images taken by the Defendant at the time of committing the crime, it can be seen that the Defendant was shot up the instant stuff, which was located inside the inner part of the goods located in the front plastic tent (for example, the tape of the said stuff was removed, and then the said stuff was opened, and then the Defendant was shot up other stuffs. It seems obvious that the head action in the instant stuff had a place where the control and management of the marina was under the control and management of the marina. In the above place, it appears that there were other stuffs other than the instant stuff. In light of the fact that the Defendant was shot up the instant stuff, and the Defendant did not open the instant stuff on the upper part of the instant stuff, even if having no part of opening or opening the stuff, the Defendant did not specifically have his own efforts to confirm the stuff.

Even if so, it was aware that at least it constitutes property owned and managed by others, not property disposed of by others.

It is inevitable to see it.

The defendant;