No one shall distribute game products with no indication of matters concerning the rating of the game product and the information on the contents of the game product, or provide such for the use thereof without attaching a device indicating information on the operation of the game product.

The defendant from March 10, 2014 to the same year.

4. By October, 10th of Jeju City, the Defendant’s operation “D Gameland” on the Defendant’s 1st floor, set up a total of 74 units, including 40 pullar game machine and 34 smart game machine, and operated a general game room. While a mark should be attached to the outside of the game machine indicating the name, use grade, classification number, serial number production date, etc. of the game, one game machine with no rating certificate, three game producing companies with different game products with different rating certificate, and 44 units of game products with no manufacturing date, such as 40 game products with no rating certificate, were installed and provided for use to unspecified users without marks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph and result of appraisal;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting a crime and the choice of punishment: Article 45 subparagraph 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 32 (1) 6 of the same Act; Selection of fines;

1. Suspension of sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i) (the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; (ii) the fact that the game was committed while operating the game room in the state of being purchased and delivered by the Internet in the absence of experience in the operation of the game room; (iii) the fact that the contents of the violation could not be considered to be relatively heavy; and (iv) the fact that the contents of the violation were corrected in entirety and the administrative disposition for the suspension of business was planned separately for ten days, etc., a suspended sentence shall be deemed to be remarkably normal); and (iii) the fact that the contents of the violation were also corrected; and (iv) the fact that the administrative disposition for the suspension of business was planned separately; and