The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

On January 21, 2017, at around 11:00, Defendants sought complaints from the husband of the victim F (53 Does, L) located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, that is being responsible for audit of the redevelopment representative committee, and sought complaints from the husband of the victim who is responsible for audit of the redevelopment representative committee.

Defendant

A, in front of the instant Schlage, he saw that “I am sacriffed even if I am sauted,” and the Defendants interfered with the victim’s Schlage’s spread by force by force, such as prohibiting the business from doing so by blocking the said Schlage’s entrance and allowing customers who had not been engaged in the business.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Evidence No. 6 pages), investigation report (report on the submission of a list of reported cases)

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 314 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants who bear the costs of lawsuit: The main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act