A. Determination 1 on the Defendant’s claim for damages due to the Defendant’s mechanical disposition ) The Defendant’s D factory in the Daegu-gun District Court (hereinafter “instant factory”) around March 2, 2014.

) From Daegu District Court Decision 201Kadan3479, the enforcement officer affiliated with Seo-gu District Court decided to prohibit possession or transfer of corporeal movables attached to GX7 machinery without permission, and deliver the said machinery to F by carrying it on 1 ton truck, and in March 18, 2014, a public official separated the hedging parts of the said machinery from his/her duties and damaged the indication of seizure or other compulsory measures performed by him/her, and as follows, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million on January 28, 2015 to the Seo-gu District Court Decision 2014Ma1197, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million on September 25, 2005. According to the facts that the Plaintiff purchased from G-gu District Court Decision 2010,000,000 won on September 25, 2005, the Defendant’s allegation that the market price of the said machinery was equivalent to KRW 1601,00,000.

3. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff asserts that, in addition to the above machines, the Defendant arbitrarily disposed of the Plaintiff’s own market price of 1.5 million won, electric melting machines equivalent to the market price of 3.5 million won, 35,000 won, and industrial melting machines and oxygen cutting machines equivalent to the market price of 35,000 won, and transportation equipment equivalent to the market price of 50,000 won.

However, the entries of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5-2 alone are insufficient to recognize the fact that each of the above machinery was owned by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.