A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The lower court rendered a sentence by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant was punished by a fine due to the same type of crime; (b) the amount of defraudation was not so significant; and (c) the amount of defraudation was not repaid to D who repaid the above money to the victim instead of the victim during the near a ten-year period; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc

All the grounds for unfair sentencing asserted by the Defendant and the grounds for unfair sentencing asserted by the prosecutor are shown to be the circumstances that the lower court had already taken into account when determining the Defendant’s punishment. There are no circumstances to deem that the above conditions of sentencing have changed, and the lower court’s punishment is reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion, taking into account the above conditions of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.