However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, who had been residing in the same apartment, formed a pro rata relationship with the victim C, was unaware of the intent or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim due to the lack of any special property or income. However, the Defendant was willing to deceive the victim by making a false statement about the place of use of the borrowed money, and acquired money and valuables from the victim under the pretext of the borrowed money, etc.

1. On February 18, 2013, the Defendant would pay 1% interest per month by borrowing money from the victim in the “E Hot Spring” located in the Busan-gun, Busan-gun, for the purpose of lending money to the victim.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the fact was that there was no person who conducts bond business, and the money borrowed from the injured was used as personal living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the principal and interest of the loan.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) by deceiving the victim in the same way from around that time to April 24, 2014; and (c) by deceiving the victim from around that time in the same manner; and (b) by deceiving the victim from around that time to around April 24, 2014; and (c) by receiving or delivering a total of KRW 136,81,750, total sum of 73 times, such as the last one in the table of crimes in the attached Table (1).

2. On February 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around February 21, 2013, the Defendant would use the credit card lending to the victim at the former store; and (b) would make the payment.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the victim uses the credit card, there was no intention or ability to pay the credit card price.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and issued KB's national card on the same day from the victim, and paid 630,000 won to the purchase price of the goods. The defendant around that time from that time to that time.