2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim stated in the court of the court of the court below that “the defendant was present in the direction of the victim,” referring to “the defendant was present in the situation where he was living together with F,” and she was present in the back, and she was present in the office. ii) At the court of the court of the court of the court below, Ha was present in the court of the court of the court below that “the defendant was present in the process of making a file, making a file, and leaving the office.” The witness stated in the court of the court of the court below that “the defendant was present in the form of a document. The victim was present in the court of the court of the court below. The witness stated that “The victim was present in the direction of the victim.” At the time when the victim was present in the direction of the victim, she could have been present in the file to the extent that the defendant and the victim did not have any intention.”

B. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.