1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the grounds of appeal by Defendants A, B, C, and D in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendants guilty of the crime of interference with business of this case. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the establishment of unfair labor practices by intervention in control, interference

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the grounds of appeal by Defendant E, F, G, H, and I in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court’s determination that the Defendants guilty of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (even at night) is justifiable as it is in accordance with the purport of the judgment of remanding. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.