However, the execution of imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from around 22:00 on June 17, 2016 to 22:30 on the same day, had the victim C’s “D” store located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City from around 22:0 to around 22:30 on the same day, intended to drink alcohol at the “D” convenience store in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and obstructed the victim’s business operation by force by forcing the victim to leave the convenience store by threatening the victim’s convenience store in favor of the victim while avoiding the disturbance, and by inducing the victim to take advantage of the convenience store in favor of the victim, and by threatening the victim to take advantage of the convenience store in favor of the victim, and preventing the customer from entering.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report of investigation;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the reflectivity of the accused and the intention of not