In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

피고인들은 2013. 9. 11. 23:40경 서울 종로구 C빌딩 앞 노상에서 택시를 잡는 과정에서 피해자 D와 시비되어, 피고인 A은 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때려 넘어뜨리고 몸통을 발로 수회 걷어차고, 피고인 B는 이에 가세하여 피해자의 몸통을 수회 발로 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as “the inside and outside of the franchisium,” which requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and D

1. The suspect's photograph of the damaged part of the DNA;

1. Investigation report (verification of the degree of injury inflicted on a suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc. and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;