A. As a medical map, the Defendant was merely engaged in the instant act at his/her academic desire on his/her body, and there was no intention to commit an indecent act.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment and 80 hours’ order for sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the assertion of mistake, i.e., the defendant's specific behavior at the time of the instant case: (a) considering the victim's bucks treatment for bucks; (b) inserting the left fingers into the victim's negative part; and (c) repeating the above treatment again; (d) again putting the left fingers into the victim's negative part; and (e) taking the local inhales treatment in the treatment room; and (e) taking the victim's hump treatment; (e) taking the victim's 2ndic part in the body of the victim's body; (e) taking the victim's humbuck and continuously taking the victim's left part in the body of the body of the victim; and (e) taking the victim's humthic behavior at the time of taking the body of the victim's humthic behavior; and (e) taking the victim's humthic part in the body of the hospital; (ii) taking part of the victim's hum.