추심금
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following additional or supplementary judgments as to the allegations that are used in the court of first instance or are emphasized or added by the plaintiffs in this court. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of
2. The grounds of appeal No. 1-C. on the part of the judgment of the first instance.
The third chapter of paragraph (the fourth chapter below) is used as "H Co., Ltd." (hereinafter referred to as "H") and all of "H Co., Ltd." in this part shall be used as "H".
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same.
First, the provisional seizure order of the claim is the provisional seizure order of the claim(hereinafter referred to as the "provisional seizure order of this case") which will be 6th (the fifth).
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. (f) Section 1-1 (f) (6-8) of the judgment of the court of first instance (the 6th 6th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th) was followed. (1) The non-party company commenced construction according to the first contract on January 20, 201. On February 28, 2014, the construction of the non-party company was approved for the completion of the building
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is 3-C.
1) Paragraph 1 to 2 (the 12th half) (the 12th 4-5th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th) was deleted. The part of the th th th th th th th th
3. Additional or supplementary judgment
A. Whether the provisional attachment decision of this case is effective is legitimate in the case where there are special circumstances, such as where the scope of execution against the pertinent debtor or the third debtor can be clearly distinguishable in the provisional attachment decision of this case, even though the amount of execution claims by each debtor or the third debtor is not specified in the provisional attachment decision of this case.
At the time of the provisional seizure of this case, Plaintiff A.