However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of one million won by the Seoul Southern District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On January 3, 2020, at around 19:14, the Defendant driven an Efran vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.050% alcohol concentration from the 1km section from the 2nd day of Yangju-si to the front day of D located in the same city C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal history records, reply reports, and investigation reports (verification of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant again commits the crime of this case even if he had a previous conviction of the same kind; the time interval from the previous conviction of the same kind; the defendant's blood alcohol density; the age, character and conduct and environment of the defendant; his age, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as circumstances after the crime, shall be