beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.01.05 2017고단1081

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is currently in the period of suspension of execution, after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury on October 10, 2017 at the Changwon District Court Branch Branch, for six months of suspension of execution on October 18, 2017. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on August 25, 2017 due to quasi-Robbery in the same court on August 25, 2017 and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on September 2, 2017.

On October 28, 2017, the Defendants were on board the F personal taxi of the victim E (67 years old) in the deputy head of the bus terminal located in the synthetic Dong of the members of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 09:40.

1. On October 28, 2017, Defendant A boarded the head of the taxi operated by the said victim on the 10:00 on October 28, 2017, and thereafter, Defendant A abused the driver of the said taxi in operation by cutting off the victim’s cell phone from the victim who was in the Defendant’s land and currency from the victim who was in the Defendant’s land at the time of the lapse of the post office located in Masan located in 639 as of the said 3.15 of the said cab, due to the Defendant’s taxi charge that the said cab did not have any money.

2. On October 28, 2017, Defendant B: (a) operated the said taxi to report the damage therefrom, and arrived at the H box by Defendant A, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, at around 10:15, Defendant B, who was urged by the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the said box, to wait for or return home to the cab at the instant box; (b) was sprinked by Defendant B, who was urged by the said assistant I to take a bath to “I Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY YY YY YY YYY YY YYY YY YYY YYY YYY YY Y

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted a slope I, a police officer, to interfere with his/her legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement by the witness J;

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and the choice of punishment against the crime - Defendant A: Specific crimes.