However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No one shall arrange, induce or induce sexual traffic or provide a place for sexual traffic, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from September 25, 2014 to October 9, 2014, leased four guest rooms, such as Suwon-si Office Officetel 101 Dong 219, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts against unspecified customers by bringing out the above officetels 219 rooms, etc., in return for sexual intercourse with the unspecific male descendants, in which the Internet site advertisement reported and contacted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of F, G, H, and E;

1. Reporting on summary of support for digital investigation;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Atel-site photograph, Internet I-site output, and output from the Internet J-site;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the officetel lease contract;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment (compacting imprisonment with prison labor, with prison labor),

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures, Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] 19 years or older, the aggravated area (1 to 3 years), such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts and commercial sex acts (1 to 1 year, etc.) [the specially under), advertising or mediation [the decision of sentence] using a medium with high radio wave [the defendant] 8 months of imprisonment, the suspension of execution of execution of 2 years or more, and the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and the punishment for the crime of this case is not easy again. However, the defendant does not commit the crime of this case against the defendant, taking into account the fact that he/she does not repeat the crime of this case.