예금반환청구 승낙의사표시 이행
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The land, which is the land before the division, was 37,842 square meters of F forest land in the Jeondong-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, which is the land before the division (hereinafter “land before the division”) is the land under the joint name assessment of the Plaintiff’s deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased on March 5, 2019”; hereinafter “the deceased”) and the I (the deceased on September 26, 1950) attached to Defendant E on November 16, 1919, when the Plaintiff’s deceased (hereinafter “the deceased on September 26, 1950”).
B. On November 3, 1984, the clan of this case changed its title holder to the clan of this case pursuant to the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (No. 3562, invalidation) and completed the registration of ownership preservation on the land of this case on January 14, 1985.
C. On April 6, 2015, the land before subdivision was divided into 2,183 square meters of F forest land in the Gandong-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, and 21,427 square meters of J forest and 14,232 square meters of K forest and 14,232 square meters of land.
(hereinafter “instant real estate”). D.
On July 15, 2015, the forest room-gun acquired through consultation for public works the amount of 21,427 square meters and the amount of 14,232 square meters in J-gun, the forest room-gun, the previous North Korea, for the public works, and paid 379,025,150 won to the instant clan in the manner of paying the purchase price (hereinafter “the instant purchase price”) to the deceased and the instant account opened under the joint names of the Defendants, and the deceased dealt with the business related to the said acquisition in the capacity of the representative of the instant clan.
E. Defendant E filed a lawsuit against the instant clan for the claim for land compensation, and the first instance court failed in its entirety (this Court 2015da2732), but the appellate court [the Gwangju High Court 2016Na542] continued to have rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation that “the Defendant E pay KRW 189,50,000 to the Defendant E” was final and conclusive. After that, Defendant E received a ruling of recommending reconciliation as above, from the instant account, 153,929,925 [the 189,50,000 won - 35,570,075 won], and the real estate sale and purchase of the instant real estate in accordance with the final and conclusive ruling of recommending reconciliation as above.