However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 14, 2018, at a restaurant located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si B, the Defendant: (a) expressed that D, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report, expressed the Defendant’s personal information, and used the Defendant to stop home on the ground that D, who was in the position of the Mapo-dong Police Station C district unit of the Mapo-dong Police Station, sent out to the site, used the Defendant’s personal information, and used the Defendant’s home home, and used the victim’s left breast part of the bit 5 times.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the above police officer and interfered with his legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the recognition of the crime of this case by the defendant, and the degree of assault is not relatively much severe, circumstances of the case, and criminal records, etc.