The lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the evidence of confession

The argument that the indictment of this case constitutes abuse of the right to prosecute is not a legitimate ground of appeal, which is alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant, or by the court below that the indictment of this case was not subject to judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.