If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 28, 2017, at around 18:50, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about 10 minutes by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C (n, 60 years of age) (n, the Defendant) who had been located therein, for the reason that the customer’s identity cannot be known; (b) and (c) the Defendant was able to take a bath; and (d) the Defendant had a wall to the table and table tables that were located therein.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the Act”) of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, Etc. is relatively short of the period during which the Defendant committed the instant crime on January 27, 2016 after the execution of the said sentence was completed, and interfered with the victim’s business by interfering with the business. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s desire to have the police officers come to commit any disturbance and avoiding disturbance, etc., even after being arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense, and the criminal records of criminal punishment are not good. In addition, the Daegu District Court sentenced on July 4, 2014 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) and on January 27, 2016, and then continued to interfere with the victim’s business, and other favorable circumstances, age, motive and motive of the instant crime, etc.