beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.02.03 2015고정239

상해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2015, at around 21:45, the Defendant: (a) laid off the victim F F (37 tax) in E E E E-art’s e-mail located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu; (b) laid off the victim F at one time more than once due to the Defendant’s caturology on the part of the Defendant’s street code; and (c) b (38 years old) the victim B (the victim F) who is a one-way driver of the victim F (the victim F) cat, and sphered the victim B’s e-line with his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant brought about about about 1-2 to the victim F, the right slots that need to be treated for about 1-2 weeks, and the victim B put about about 2 weeks of light salt and tension.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 전항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 전항과 같은 이유로 피해자 A(58 세) 와 시비가 되어 다투다가 화가 나 손으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 1회 때리고, 피해자의 옷을 잡아당겨 넘어뜨린 후 발로 피해자를 1회 찼다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as cutting a peltos that need to be treated for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant B in the first trial record;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness B and F of this Court (defendant A)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants who choose the punishment for the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty)

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant A and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that although the defendant had a fact that he fatd in the victim B at the time, there was no fact that he inflicted an injury on the victim B, and there was no fact that he saw the victim F.

2. Determination

A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted by the victim F in relation to the victim F’s injury.

1) F is a complaint submitted to the police.